My original question on stackoverflow:
What is the best approach to use 3rd party that uses another version of other 3rd party (log4net) already used in the system?
- Currently we use log4net of version 18.104.22.168 and we should start using some 3rd party components developed by other team.
- Mentioned component references log4net of version 22.214.171.124.
- All binaries are deployed into one folder.
I'm sure that we cannot rebuild our sources with 126.96.36.199 version, because there are too many other dependencies and will require lot of efforts. Are there any other approaches to solve this issue? I'm NOT looking for too sophisticated that have something to do with CLR assemblies loading, but would hear them with great pleasure. I'm looking for the simplest approaches. I guess someone has encountered the same issue.
I got (as for now) two answers and I would like to try them out.
So I created 3 projects, one references log4net of version of 188.8.131.52 and another references 184.108.40.206. Both of them are referenced in client console application, which also references one of the log4net assemblies. In client application I'm trying to execute code that requires log4net in both of the assemblies.
Below is projects layout:
When I execute my code I'm getting error:
Unhandled Exception: System.IO.FileLoadException: Could not load file or assembly 'log4net, Version=220.127.116.11, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b32731d11ce58905' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)
File name: 'log4net, Version=18.104.22.168, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b32731d11ce58905'
at ConsoleAppReferencesLog4Net1._2._10._0_andBothAssemblies.Program.Main(String args) in
In order to resolve this I tried suggestion one by one...
Suggestion number 1
Redirecting Assembly Versions
Accordingly to MSDN there is possibility to redirect code execution to assembly with higher version, just with using following configuration:
<configuration> <runtime> <assemblyBinding xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1"> <dependentAssembly> <assemblyIdentity name="log4net" publicKeyToken="b32731d11ce58905" culture="neutral" /> <bindingRedirect oldVersion="22.214.171.124" newVersion="126.96.36.199"/> </dependentAssembly> </assemblyBinding> </runtime> </configuration>
I've tried it and it did not work. Reason is that we cannot do redirection between assemblies with different PublicKeyToken-s. log4net 188.8.131.52 has "b32731d11ce58905" and log4net 184.108.40.206 has "1b44e1d426115821". Also see this stackoverflow question.
Suggestion number 2
Use GAC. So when I install those two assemblies into GAC:
In this case code works, but suggestion doesn't work for us, since we do not want to gac assemblies we use.
So I've been thinking about another approach.
Approaches that require rebuilding our code with different version of log4net are not suitable for us. At least for now.
Another thing about which I've been thinking is to load those assemblies into different application domain or host 3rd party that uses 220.127.116.11 under different WinService. Both of these are cumbersome solutions and I like to avoid them.
If you have some ideas, could you please let me know!
[EDITED 7 Oct, 2010 11PM]
FUNNY-HAPPY-END OF THIS STORY
Do you know what is the most interesting about all of this? It is how it has finished. We contacted those guys, who developed component we now should use. They gave us know, that they were encountering issues with updating on-the-fly configuration file for log4net 18.104.22.168. By their words, new version of log4net is not capable of doing this. So they sent as simple application that demonstrates this, and indeed, after updating config when app is running, 22.214.171.124 did not catch up new configuration, but 126.96.36.199 was working just fine. This surprised me very much, so I went to this download page and downloaded latest binaries. When I tried it got working!!! Actually I guess that they simply used version of log4net buit with references to .net framework 1.1, and we should use one built with .net 2.0 (Yeah! Actually if you would download you will see.)
After all of this, they created new sub-release of their sources especially for us and they were able to fix some minor bug. Great news! Unexpected end of story! :)